D120.de/forum

Hi,

all participants that have not contacted me or Dr. Eichberg (eichberg@informatik.tu-darmstadt.de) for an Oral Exam Appointment yet, please do so as soon as possible.

Best,
Patrick

Hi All,

the grades for the exam should become visible in the near future.
There will be no central appointment for the exam inspection.
Please contact me directly for an appointment before Friday, April 5th.

Best,
Patrick Müller

Hi,

the Exam will take place in S202/ C205 at 11 am on March 19.

Best,

Patrick

P.S. Is this not visible for you in Tucan ? This should be the authoritative source for exam information.

Hi, the grades for the exam should be visible in TUCAN by now. The exam inspection will take place in S202/ A213 on Monday, 27 August at 10:00. If you cannot attend, you can send someone else with a written consent and your student id. If this is not possible for you, please send me an e-mail. Best,...

Hi,

the tests are updated and regrading is in progress.
Therefore the results should reappear sometime this afternoon.

Edit: The results should be visible again.

Best,
Patrick

Hi All, I updated the Submission Platform with only some hiccups (Learning: Don't deploy on friday). You should be able to see the total amount of points that you achieved. The results for exercise 9 should be visible now, too. If you have any complaints about your grading, please let me know next w...

Hi,

It won't. I just assumed this was a copy/paste error.

Best,
Patrick

Hi, the output comes from the .changed event created on the signal space. This in turn depends on the constant SPEED and the Signal time. You increment the value of time by one every 20 ms. Since space depends on time, it is updated and the corresponding change event triggers and the current value o...

Hi,

the Intellij parsers do not always work correctly(i.e. it marks code that is correct as incorrect and vice-versa) in the presence of path dependent types (and some other more advanced scala features), for these you should use sbt/scalac directly.

Best,
Patrick

Hi,

you do not need to know the low level detail differences between Java 8 and Scala closures, but you should be able to read(/write) code that uses them.

Best,
Patrick

Hi,

to be correct, both AnyRef and Any are part of the type hierarchy resulting from linearization, therefore if the task in the exam does not say otherwise, you have to include it.

Best,
Patrick

Hi, on first glance this seems correct. You are missing AnyRef and Any, though. If you want to check your results (e.g. for other examples) you can leverage the scala compiler: import scala.reflect.runtime.universe._ class A println(typeOf[A].baseClasses) // will print the base classes in the correc...

Hi, Ah okay. So, what we achieve by doing this (instead of calling the accept() methods in Project's accept() directly) is a higher decoupling between the ConcreteElement classes (in this case Project) and the visitors (because we don't have Project in a visit signature), which simplifies later modi...

You mean the accept(...) method in this case, right? No. The implementation of the visit calls the accept methods of the contained elements. Maybe my wording was not precise enough here: The visit method of a aggregate element [...] With this I meant the visit method of a visitor that handles the a...

Hi, and super call stack will be: F-> E -> C-> A -> D -> B -> D -> A -> C -> E - F I'm not sure what you mean here. In general you should provide the linearization with the left side beeing the lowest type in the hierarchy, i.e. the inverse of what you have for F (I did not check whether you lineari...