D120.de/forum

Sorry, an earlier slot is not possible.

Cheers,
Ingo

Dear all,

we will offer another slot on Monday, March 31, 16h00-17h00 in room S202 A213.

Cheers,
Ingo

Since I haven't heard from anyone, we'll drop the slot on Tuesday.

Are there any other students that like to review their exam and cannot attend on Wednesday? For now, I have only heard from the one poster above, who is not interested anymore. If I don't hear from anyone else, we will drop the slot on Tuesday.

Cheers,
Ingo

As a courtesy, we'll have another date on Tuesday 18, 11:00 - 11:45am. This date is exclusively for students who cannot appear Wednesday because of another exam and we will close the review 11:45am sharp!

For all others, the date is still Wednesday, March 19, 10am-12pm.

Hi all,

The post-exam review will be Wednesday, March 19, 10am-12pm in room S202 A213. Your grades will be available some time next week.

Cheers,
Ingo

To extend a little on what Michael said: it wasn't one task with three questions following up on each other. Look at it that way: they were rather 4 subtasks roughly 34/4 = 8.5 points worth each (some a bit more, some a bit less), one for each component of the system. We joined the principles and pa...

As I mentioned in my post in the other reactive programming thread a minute ago, the kind of exercises you refer to are not very relevant for the exam. For all intents and purposes, you should consider the order of evaluation of two callbacks or signals on the same level (as in your last example) as...

Unless Guido wants to make them public, you won't be able to look at the tasks. They won't really help you with the exam anyways. This does *not* mean that there won't be any reactive exercises in the exam. I do advise you to look at the two reactive team exercises and the slides instead. Cheers, Ingo

Thanks for the reminder, I just committed them. Disclaimer: Please understand that the solutions are not always self-contained, meaning that you won't get the complete picture if you haven't visited the corresponding exercise sessions, similar to how lecture slides don't tell the whole story either....

You are open to return an empty sequence of documents if nothing gets added to the paginated builder. I am not sure whether this addresses your problem since I can't really follow the reasoning in your last post. I do have a very simple implementation of the paginated builder, with a single line tha...

You are open to change the underlying builder of the canvasses. It ultimately depends on which side of the bridge pattern you implement the image functionality. I don't think there is one single correct version in this case, since I can imagine arguments to support either alternative.

Cheers,
Ingo

Hi all, as someone pointed out to me in the forum, the samples in the project template were not correctly formatted. I have committed an updated project template, with correctly indented samples and a small update to HTMLBuilder.addElement, removing two spurious newlines. Moreover, you do not have t...

No wait. I just noticed that the html samples are totally scrambled. Sorry for that. I have committed an update for the project template. There shouldn't be a newline at all. If you have one now, that's okay, we are mostly interested in correct indentation. Whether you have some newlines here or the...

Interesting, I need to check my reference implementation. I am pretty sure that the samples were generated with that addElement method. Anyhow, you are of course open to make minor changes to the code template to suit your needs.

Cheers,
Ingo